Fla. Juvenile Justice Worker Sues Over Firing BUT DOESNT LET THEM KNOW HE HAD A HISTORY OF ILLEGAL DRUG USE

Fla. Juvenile Justice Worker Sues Over Firing.

St. Rep Barreiro went on to work for the DJJ and has since been fired.

January 20, 2009
Gus Barreiro’s termination letter

The Department of Juvenile Justice isn’t saying much about why former state Rep. Gus Barreiro of Miami Beach was abruptly fired from his post Friday.

“It’s legally sensitive right now,” said agency secretary Frank Peterman, who served with Barreiro in the House. “An issue took place, and it was a violation of our main policy, a policy I’m trying to strengthen within the agency.”

DJJ does provide a copy of Barreiro’s letter of termination, which cites a provision in the administrative code dealing with “violation of law or agency rules,” including “standards of conduct” under Chapter 112, the ethics code. A DJJ spokesman says Barreiro’s dismissal related to misuse of computer equipment.

Barreiro, 49, was a Republican House member from 1998 to 2006. At DJJ, he held the title of operational support administrator and earned about $72,000 a year.

 I wonder if St. Rep. Barreiro would have stepped in if he knew about the DJJ employee’s Illegal Drug Use?

“We are a criminal justice agency that works every day to prevent and reduce juvenile crime,” said Secretary William Bankhead. “Our public employees must be drug-free and set the right example for young people.” CLEARLY the individual WAS NOT DRUG-FREE if he wasn’t willing to take a drug test.

A history of My Evil Aunt’s Rat-Bastard Husband’s illegal drug use

My Evil Aunt, was asked during a deposition in 2006 when was the last time her husband had done illegal drugs. She said that it was the in the 70’s and stated “Well, it WAS the 70’s” as if to imply that everyone was doing illegal drugs during the 70’s.

That same day Her Rat-Bastard was asked during a deposition when was the last time that he had done illegal drugs. He claimed that it was 10 years ago.

This is VERY odd. There is a TWO decade discrepancy here folks!!! At least one of these two people is a LIAR. The question is why would either of them lie about his ILLEGAL drug use.

Maybe my Evil Aunt believes that her husband stopped doing illegal drugs in the 1070’s because he was HIDING HIS ILLEGAL DRUG USE from his wife. If this is the case than there is something deeply disturbing about the character of her Rat-Bastard Husband.

On the other hand, maybe My Evil Aunt is LYING when she is stating that her husband stopped doing drugs in the 1970’s. This is probably more likely the case.(We have shown several examples of my Evil Aunt lying and she is a proven LIAR) She appears to be attempting to lesson the fact that her husband, has taken illegal drugs the majority of his adult life.

The question should be why would she want to lessen this fact? Could it be that she wants to hide the fact that her husband’s illegal behavior continues? Or that maybe during a previous case or deposition one or both of them made statements that were contrary to the facts.

Something to ponder when The Rat-Bastard talks about drug policies.

If only Judge Hinkle knew the whole story about my Evil Aunt’s husband and his illegal drug use then he would not have thought this argument to be far-fetched

Department attorneys had argued that testing [my Evil Aunt’s husband] was necessary because if he were a drug user, he might have looked up juvenile records to find drug offenders and then threatened them or their families if they failed to provide him with drugs. Hinkle rejected this argument, noting that “to call this defense theory far-fetched would be charitable.”